Legal Opinion

Osgood v. Hoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1942No. Civ. No. 11996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Janie M. Osgood died testate in Los Angeles. In due time her will was admitted to probate. The decedent left her surviving one heir, a son, Alfred J. Osgood. By the terms of said will the decedent left all of her estate to Eliza A. Osgood in trust for said son, A. J. Osgood. The trust was in form a spendthrift trust. The will named Eliza A. Osgood, wife of decedent’s son, as executrix of said will and as trustee of said trust.

On September 21, 1939, Eliza A. Osgood, as executrix, filed her second and final account, report, and petition for distribution. In form it was regular and complete in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McGee v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McColgan v. Magee, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In re Estate of CrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Soule v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of MuhammadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Belli v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Fayler v. KarauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API