Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Sauve

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1985No. 50600-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Petitioner Maurice Sauve challenges the constitutionality of his conviction on several counts of robbery and possession of stolen property. Petitioner claims the rule announced in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 63 L. Ed. 2d 639, 100 S. Ct. 1371 (1980) should apply to his case and that consequently this court must declare the warrantless arrest and search conducted in his home unconstitutional. In addition, petitioner claims his right to confront witnesses against him was violated and that a conviction for robbery and possession of stolen property violates the double jeopardy provisions of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Personal Restraint of St. PierreWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API