Legal Opinion
In Re the Personal Restraint of Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1986No. 50702-3PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
In this personal restraint petition (PRP), Gary Taylor challenges his conviction on two counts of first degree murder, claiming the rule announced in State v. Ringer, 100 Wn.2d 686, 674 P.2d 1240 (1983) should apply retroactively to his case and consequently this court must declare his warrantless arrest and the subsequent search of his automobile unconstitutional. Since we hold the analysis contained in Ringer concerning the exigent circumstances exception to the general prohibition against warrantless searches and seizures should not apply retroactively on collateral review, we deny the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.