Legal Opinion
Do v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 14, 2019No. 2018-1147PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
*1092 Hanh Do petitions for review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board"). The Board sustained the Department of Housing and Urban Development's ("HUD's" or "agency's") action demoting and suspending Do. In its notice of proposed action, HUD charged Do with "negligence of duty" for hiring and later promoting an employee when Do knew that the employee did not have a college degree, which the agency viewed as a requirement. On appeal, the Board agreed with Do that a college degree was not required and that the employee could alternatively qualify for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Braun v. HhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Coy v. TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Coy v. TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Dubnow v. WilkieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Lowe v. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.