Legal Opinion

OLD RELIABLE WHOLESALE, INC. v. Cornell Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 24, 2009No. Case 5:06 CV 2389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID D. DOWD, JR., District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement action, plaintiff Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. (Old Reliable) alleges that certain products manufactured and/or sold by defendant Cornell Corporation (Cornell) infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,069,950 (the '950 Patent). 1 Cornell disputes that its products infringe the '950 Patent, and alleges that the '950 Patent is invalid. In their complaint and counterclaims, both parties seek attorney fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285.

The Court previously issued a Claims Construction Order, and established a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. v. Cornell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API