City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM:
-This is a proceeding under the charter of the city of St. Louis in which appellants’ property was assessed for benefits from the widening of Market Street. Appellants were not defendants in the suit to condemn the property taken for widening the street, because none of their property was taken or damaged. They became parties to the proceeding by reason of their property having been included -within the benefit or taxing district created by the commissioners, appointed by the circuit court, to determine the damages in the condemnation suit and to assess benefits to property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of St. Louis v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Church v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Meyering v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- State v. HawkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Wolfson v. ChelistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- City of St. Louis v. PopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.