Legal Opinion

Smith v. Akstein

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided December 30, 2005No. 104CV1002WSDCCHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DUFFEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Hagy [75]. Because no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, the Court must conduct a plain error review of the record. United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050, 104 S.Ct. 729, 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984). After careful review, the Court finds no plain error in the Magistrate Judge’s factual or legal conclusions.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS AS ITS ORDER the Magistrate Judge’s Report and…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bozeman v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  2. Ribis v. Mike Barnard Chevrolet-Cadillac, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2007
  3. Fields v. Atlanta Independent School SystemDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  4. CHERELLDA BRANCH-MCKENZIE v. BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Barrett v. Reeves Construction CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API