Legal Opinion

Samuel Colaizzi and Samuel Indovina v. Daniel Walker, Governor, State of Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 14, 1976No. 75-2060PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD, Chief Judge.

The principal issue for decision in this case is whether defendant Walker’s assertions in a press release, that plaintiffs abused their official positions in attempting to force a company under their supervision to drop criminal actions against an employee, deprived plaintiffs of a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs Samuel Colaizzi and Samuel Indovina appeal from orders of the district court dismissing their claims against several of the defendants, and granting judgment on the pleadings to the rest of the defendants.

At the time of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Sherwin S. Stern v. United States Gypsum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Juan A. Marrero and Maria Marrero v. City of Hialeah, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Dee v. Borough of DunmoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API