Legal Opinion

Al Berman, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 1954No. 11322_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

The water damage insurance policy on which this suit is based covered a Philadelphia haberdashery store “ * * * against all Direct Loss by ‘Water Damage’ * * * Except as Hereinafter Provided * * Water damage is defined in the policy to mean among other things “the accidental discharge, leakage- or overflow of water or steam from * * * plumbing systems * * * the accidental admission of rain or snow directly to the interior of the building through defective roofs, leaders or spouting * * Under “Perils not included” the policy provides that “This Company shall not be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Kraftsow v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Richman v. Home Insurance Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Fix v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stone v. Royal Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Arjen Motor Hotel Corporation D/B/A Paul Miller Beach Motel v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Jacobs v. Camden Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API