Legal Opinion

Bruegger v. Marzall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 4, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 2444Published

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This action was instituted pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 4915, 35 U.S.Code, § 63, seeking the issuance by the Commissioner of Patents of a patent to the plaintiff Criscom-Russell Company on a new method of making finned heat exchanger tubes. Plaintiffs claim No. 25 regarded by the patent office as illustrative of the rejected claims consisted of the following:

“25. The method of making fin tubing which comprises furrowing the surface of the tube by a plowing action turning up material from below the surface and leaving it attached to the tube along the edges of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  3. Bullard Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Berry v. RobertsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API