Legal Opinion

United States v. Willie Taw Newsome

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1990No. 89-6029PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONWAY, District Judge.

Defendant-appellant Willie Taw New-some entered a plea of guilty to possession of approximately 299.3 grams of marijuana with intent to distribute, Count Two of a two-count indictment, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He now appeals the sentence he received pursuant to the Career Offender provisions of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines. He argues that the district court 1 erroneously classified him as a career offender and that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.

I

On December 19, 1987, Newsome was serving a ten-year…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ralph Robbins v. Larry Chronister, in His Personal and Official Capacity, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Carlos Jesus GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Charles Joseph JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API