Legal Opinion
Lace Selling Co. v. Shapiro
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The plaintiff, a lace manufacturer, contracted to sell a quantity of lace goods to the defendants, who were dealers in laces. The obligations of the parties were expressed in nine separate and distinct orders, which, during the months from October, 1919, to April, 1920, were given to the plaintiff by the defendants and accepted by the plaintiff. In each order it was specified that deliveries should be made “ as soon as possible.” Owing to the scarcity of lace goods, and the insistent demands for deliveries made by other customers of the plaintiff, the quantity of laces delivered by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wester v. . Casein Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Rubber Trading Co. v. Manhattan Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Triangle Radio Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. S. M. Gallert & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin Research & Development Corp. v. Swift Electrical Supply Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Nicholson v. American Hide & Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Anness v. Seaboard Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Mercer Tube & Manufacturing Co. v. American Zinc Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940