Legal Opinion

Hulen v. City of Hermiston

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1977No. 11,001, CA 7890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1143JOHNSON, J.

This is an action for personal injuries under the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.260 et seq, alleging negligence by the city in allowing its employe, a policeman, to drive a loose horse across a public road. Plaintiff alleges that defendant was negligent in four particulars:

"1. Allowing its employee to chase loose horses across . public roadways without lights or warning devices.
"2. Permitting its employee to chase loose horses without assistance.
"3. Not stopping traffic or flagging traffic before driving loose horses across a public roadway.
"4. Driving loose horses on a public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Borden v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Jones v. Chehalem Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Wright v. Scappoose School District No. IJCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Leonard v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Moody v. Lane County, Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Dykeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Murphy v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API