Legal Opinion
In the Matter of DR
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 4, 1988No. 85-1588PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 A.2d 1260 (1988)
In the Matter of D.R. Appeal of R.R.
No. 85-1588.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued October 6, 1987.
Decided May 4, 1988.
Marion E. Baurley, Washington, D.C., for appellant R.R.
Charlotte Brookins-Pruitt, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom James R. Murphy, Acting Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.
Rebecca L. Burke, Washington, D.C., for appellee D.R.
Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and FERREN and ROGERS, Associate Judges.
FERREN, Associate Judge:
R.R.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scoggins v. JudeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Avenue Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Carey v. Crane Service Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Rosenberg v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yourick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Yourick v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009