Legal Opinion

Ecclesiastes 3:1, Inc. v. Cambridge Savings Bank

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 7, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

By two separate actions in the Land Court, which were consolidated for hearing and disposition, the plaintiff sought: (a) an order (G. L. c. 237, §§ 1 and 5, as amended by St. 1973, c. 1114, § 227) for possession of certain premises on Forest Street in Cambridge against the defendants Martin B. and Herbert S. Hoffman, who claimed paramount title to the property as grantees under a foreclosure deed from the Cambridge Savings Bank (bank); and (b) a declaration (G. L. c. 231A, § 1) that it held an unencumbered freehold or an estate of fee simple in the premises by reason of its acquisition at a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  2. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Noyes v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. HRPT Advisors, Inc. v. MacDonald, Levine, Jenkins & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  2. Siano v. MartinelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Eaton v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n & Another (AndMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  4. Latham v. Homecomings Financial LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010
  5. McElligott v. LukesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API