Legal Opinion
George C. Papageorge v. Matt Banks
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2013No. 13-CV-333PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
In February 2012, appellant George Papageorge filed a one-paragraph complaint against appellees Matt and Diane Banks, alleging that they had “absconded with settlement monies and cashed a check knowing that most of the funds were liened and intended to go to the plaintiff.” Thereafter, Papageorge sought and obtained a prejudgment writ of attachment against the Bankses, having advised the court that the Bankses had been paid funds from a settlement agreement with Eastern Savings Bank (“ESB”), and that Papageorge was entitled to those funds under a separate agreement…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Onyeoziri v. SpivokDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Perry v. SeraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia DausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- JOHN ATKINS v. 4940 WISCONSIN, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- George Papageorge v. Boyle StuckeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia DausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017