Legal Opinion
George Papageorge v. Boyle Stuckey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2018No. 17-CV-598PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Fisher, Associate Judge:
*427 In the latest chapter of a long-running property dispute, George Papageorge alleges that Boyle Stuckey and Afomia Stuckey ("the Stuckeys") and Eastern Savings Bank ("ESB") violated his rights under the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act ("TOPA"), D.C. Code §§ 42-3404.02 to 42-3404.13 (2012 Repl.). Papageorge claims that a former tenant of the property, Matt Banks, validly assigned TOPA rights to him. The trial court granted summary judgment for ESB and the Stuckeys on two grounds. First, the court found that judicial estoppel precluded Papageorge from invoking TOPA…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wagner v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- 1836 S STREET TEN. ASS'N, INC. v. Estate of B. BattleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- National Ass'n of Postmasters of the United States v. Hyatt Regency WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. PappasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Allman v. SnyderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 1305 Rhode Island Ave, NW v. John D. MussellsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023