Floyd v. United Home Improvement Center, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
Appellant Robert L. Floyd appeals from a judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court’s granting a directed verdict in favor of appellee United Home Improvement Center, Inc. (“UHIC”).
Floyd advances two assignments of error. First, he contends that the trial court erred by directing a verdict following his case-in-chief despite his presentation of evidence supporting an inference of the appellee’s negligence. Next, Floyd argues that- the trial court erred by declaring his claims for anxiety, distress, shock, or other mental suffering all “emotional distress” claims.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ohio Historical Society v. General Maintenance & Engineering Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- McInnis v. Hyatt Legal ClinicsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loukinas v. Roto-Rooter Services Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Reamensnyder v. Marino, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Trumbull County2018
- Gibson Concrete Construction v. Shrode, 5-08-11 (10-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Earl v. Leiffer Construction, Unpublished Decision (8-31-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lagos v. Field Assoc., Unpublished Decision (9-19-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003