Legal Opinion

Ward v. United States Postal Service

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 12, 2012No. 2010-3021PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge PROST, in which Chief Judge RADER joins. Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge DYK.

ON APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

2Per curiam

ORDER

Thomas O. Ward applies for an award of attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Because Mr. Ward qualifies as a “prevailing party,” we grant his request.

I

On August 19, 2008, Mr. Ward, a maintenance mechanic for the U.S. Postal Service (“Agency”), was involved in an incident with a supervisor in which he shouted, acted in a manner perceived as threatening, and disobeyed…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  2. Juanita L. Hughett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  4. Erickson v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API