Piasecki v. Court of Common Pleas, Bucks Cnty., PA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
We are asked to decide whether a habeas corpus petitioner who was subject only to registration requirements under Pennsylvania's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA") when he filed his petition was "in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State Court," as required for jurisdiction. We hold that the registration requirements were sufficiently restrictive to constitute custody and that they were imposed pursuant to the state court judgment of sentence. Accordingly, we will reverse the District Court and remand for further proceedings.
I
Following a bench…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Jane Orie v. Secretary Pennsylvania DepartmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Peter Munoz, Jr. v. Gregory SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Louis Matthew Clements v. State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Javier HartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Goguen v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.