Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Frakes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — IIon. D. E. Hind-man, Judge. Action to recover a balance alleged to be due for personal property sold and delivered to the defendant. Trial to jury, and verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

*5871 *586In his petition the plaintiff alleged that lie sold and delivered to the defendant certain cattle for the agreed price of $740; that the defendant gave him as a part payment therefor his check for $100, which “check was not -accepted in payment of said cattle,” and was never paid; that the cattle were afterwards shipped to Chicago by order •of the defendant, and were there sold under his direction for •'$034.15 The plaintiff asked judgment for a balance due -of $105.85. The facts appearing of record are substaniallv these: The defendant’s son, Wesley Frakes, was engaged in 'the grain and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank of Cincinnati v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Welch v. SpiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. Brown v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Forcheimer & Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. First National Bank v. RenoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rotterman v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Smith v. BloomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Hess v. DicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Lindburg v. EngsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  5. Cownie v. Local Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API