Legal Opinion

Merge v. Troussi

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 2, 1968No. 16673PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court dismissing the action below for lack of jurisdiction. On March 14, 1966, appellants Merge and Hooper sued the several appellees, seeking to recover certain “relocation” moving expenses allegedly due them under federal law. Upon motion of appellee Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh, the action was dismissed under F.R.Civ. P. 12 on the grounds that Congress had withdrawn jurisdiction of the Federal Courts by the 1964 amendments to the Federal Housing Act. We think the District Court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Bruner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Smallwood v. GallardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Merge v. SharottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. BrinegarDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  2. Edward R. Fountain v. The United States and Redevelopment Land AgencyUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Cheathem v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. BARTHELEMY v. RAY McDERMOTT & COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Barthelemy v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API