Cheathem v. City of Evansville
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStaton, J.
This is an appeal from a “Motion to Dismiss.” Appellants, Abram Cheathem, Jr. and Hazel Cheathem, whose real property was located at 2417 Haag Avenue in an Evansville redevelpoment project, filed an “Amended Complaint” for relocation and moving expenses equal to that received by other residents. Appellee, City of Evansville, filed its “Motion to Dismiss” which was granted by the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.
The appellants hereafter will be referred to as “Cheathem” and the appellees will hereafter be referred to as the “City.” Cheathem suggests in his brief that rhetorical paragraphs “3” and “7”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- State v. StabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- United Farm Bureau Family Life Insurance v. FultzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARIONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.