Legal Opinion

Petitt v. Morton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1931No. 11677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

From this summary of the opening statement, it is evident that the controversy in this case may be determined by the solution, of twp questions. First, did the damage to plaintiff’s property result proximate-ly from the failure of the defendant to construct fire escapes on the building as provided by the ordinance and, second, is the plaintiff barred from recovery in this action by the fact that he failed to claim in his injunction suit the damages which he now seeks to recover?

In view of the fact that the plaintiff was an occupant of the ground floor, the ordinance , for the construction of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cody V. New York Telephone Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Dari-Delite, Inc. v. ClecknerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
  3. Schmidt v. CullenOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Garner v. CorwinOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API