Legal Opinion

Garner v. Corwin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1932No. 1104Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Decided Feb 29, 1932

BY THE COURT

Defendant in error has filed an application for rehearing herein and the same is supported by a brief of counsel.

The application for reheaz-ing was not filed within the time prescribed by our rules, but we have considered the application for such rehearing upon its merits rather than strike the application from the files because it was not filed within rule day.

Upon such consideration we are of opinion that the original decision should be adhered to and the application for rehearing znay be overruled.

We have examined the case of Petit v…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petitt v. MortonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API