Legal Opinion

In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 9, 2010No. MDL No. 2151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel * : Before the Panel are two motions that collectively encompass eleven actions: five actions in the Central District of California, three actions in the Eastern District of Louisiana, and one action each in the Middle District of Florida, the Southern District of Florida, and the Southern District of West Virginia, as listed on Schedule A. 1 Though these cases have attracted an unusual amount of publicity to the Panel’s work, in all relevant aspects, the issues here are neither dramatically different nor more complex than…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. In re Valsartan N-Nitrosodimethylamine (Ndma) Contamination Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API