Hamlin v. Niedner
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Leslie and Nancy Niedner appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) finding that David E. Hamlin obtained title to a disputed parcel of land by either acquiescence or adverse possession. The Niedners argue that the court’s findings are contradictory and are not supported by the record. Because the findings are contradictory and there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of either title by adverse possession or title by acquiescence, we vacate and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the Niedners.
I. CASE HISTORY
[¶ 2] In February 2007,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Lyons v. Baptist School of Christian TrainingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Totman v. MalloyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matteson v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Christopher Grondin v. Susan R. HanscomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Dupuis v. SoucySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Androkites v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- John M. Carter v. Michael A. VoncannonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.