Legal Opinion

Totman v. Malloy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 2000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action to claim title to disputed land by adverse possession. A Land Court judge, applying a presumption of permissive use among family members, held that the plaintiffs had failed to establish the necessary elements of adverse possession. The plaintiffs appealed and we transferred the case to this court on our own motion. We conclude that the Land Court should not have applied such a presumption. We therefore vacate the judgment and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

We accept the judge’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kendall v. SelvaggioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Ottavia v. SavareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. LaChance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Tucker v. PochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Town of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. White v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Banks v. PuseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Sea Pines Condominium III Ass'n v. SteffensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Air Plum Island, Inc. v. Society for the Preservation of New England AntiquitiesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API