Legal Opinion

People v. Ball

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1971No. Docket 9699PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant James Ball was convicted by a jury of breaking and entering an occupied dwelling with intent to commit larceny. MCLA 1971 Cum Supp § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.305). He appeals as of right claiming insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to sustain the conviction and that improper conduct of the prosecutor prejudiced his right to a fair trial.

Examination of the record reveals that evidence was introduced which, if believed by the jury, was sufficient to sustain the conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

On direct examination, defendant denied commission of the crime but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BrocatoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. Margaret JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. MorenoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API