Hess v. Purcell
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Maricopa County (“County”) 1 challenges the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses awarded to Barry Hess and five voters (collectively, “Hess”) for the partial success in their mandamus action. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In anticipation of the 2010 primary and general election, Barry Hess, a gubernatorial candidate, and five citizens filed a special action petition to compel the County to perform its statutory election duties. The petition, in relevant part, asserted that:
19.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prutch v. Town of QuartzsiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Joshua Tree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023