Legal Opinion

People v. Hines

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1991No. 89CA0799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

Defendant, Terry A. Hines, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss based upon an alleged violation of the “anti-shuttling” provision of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD), § 24-60-501, Article IV(e), C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10B). We affirm.

While the defendant was in federal custody in Littleton, Colorado, he was charged with certain offenses in Jefferson County district court. He was brought to the district court by writs of habeas corpus ad prosequendum first for arraignment and later to enter a plea of guilty. After each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. United States v. Luis E. Chico and Gail A. ColelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Brown, Etc. v. District Court, Etc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. People v. BostSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ReyesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. BakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API