Legal Opinion

Kinsey v. Carr

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wood County. Action in assumpsit by T. S. Kinsey against Wm. Id-Car r et al. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings-error.

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Judge:

The plaintiff, T. S. Kinsey, brought an action of assump-sit in the circuit court of Wood county, against W. M. Carr, *450A. S. Carr, Percy H.' Carr, Wm. B. Parris and others, partners as the Carr Oil Company.

By consent of the parties, the action was abated as to all •of the defendants except the three Carrs, who plead the ...general issue, and payment. The case was upon the joint motion of the plaintiff and defendants referred to a commissioner to take and state an account between the parties. Under the order of reference the commissioner reported adversely to the plaintiff, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Barrett v. Raleigh Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Fulton v. Crosby & Beckley Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Buck v. NewberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ballard v. ChewningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunning v. Barlow & Wisler, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hoover-Dimeling Lumber Co. v. NeillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Arnold v. Potomac Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sponduris v. RameihWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dunning v. Barlow & Wisler, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API