Legal Opinion

Hoover-Dimeling Lumber Co. v. Neill

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by the Hoover-Dimeling Lumber Company, composed. of E. J. Hoover and John Dimeling, partners, against A. D. Neill. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

LyNCh, Judge:

In an action of assumpsit brought to recover of A. D. Neill, sole defendant, a balance by plaintiffs, John Dimeling and E. J. Hoover, partners trading as Hoover-Dimeling Lumber Company, Limited, claimed to be due them upon a contract of sale of real and personal property to defendant and A. Gilfillan (since deceased), a reference was ordered to state an account between the parties, pursuant to §10, ch. 129, Code 1913, they agreeing thereto. The account so stated and reported by the commissioner showed a balance of $7082.12 due defendant, and for this amount with interest judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarty v. ChalfantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Camp v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. Stearns v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  4. Allen v. HartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
  5. Trimyer v. PollardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greer Limestone Co. v. NestorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hopwood Plays, Inc. v. KemperNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Lockard v. City of SalemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Capehart v. ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. American Liability & Surety Co. v. Bluefield Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API