Maxwell v. Samson Resources Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SIMMS, Justice:
Defendant below, Samson Resources Company (Samson) appeals the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs below/appellees, Chester Maxwell, Grace Maxwell Brown, Jewell E. Cau-dle, Waunette. Johnson, James A. Maxwell, Patsy Davenport, and Bill Maxwell (the Maxwells). The trial court found that the Maxwells held a working interest in a gas-producing well and they were entitled to damages for Samson’s failure as the operator of the well to pay working interest revenues to the Maxwells. The court included prejudgment interest on those revenues compounded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Smith v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Seal v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Sunray DX Oil Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Webb v. ShullNevada Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.