Legal Opinion

Miller v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 27, 1980No. 39760, CA 16165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiffs for a declaratory judgment as to the "meaning and effect” of a written instrument by which the plaintiffs had previously granted a road easement to the defendant. In the alternative the plaintiffs sought reformation of the instrument on the grounds of mistake. The trial court held that the defendant’s interpretation of the written instrument was correct. It also held that the instrument was not ambiguous and denied reformation. The plaintiffs have appealed. We affirm.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife. They are loggers and ranchers in the Siletz area of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meskimen v. Larry Angell Salvage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Minto v. Salem Water, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Hays v. HugOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Tooker v. FeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Tipperman v. TsiatsosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Wagner v. O'CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Espedal v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API