Legal Opinion

State v. Chrisman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 23, 1994No. 92-1582PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Defendant David Wayne Chrisman appeals his convictions of two counts of third-degree theft and two counts of second-degree burglary in violation of Iowa Code sections 714-1(1), 714.2(3), 713.1, and 713.5 (1991). Chris-man argues that: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support two theft convictions; (2) the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (3) Iowa Code section 4.13 requires that he be sentenced for the thefts and burglaries under amended statutes that mitigated his punishment. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Coker v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. State of Iowa v. Keyon HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. State v. WadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Jeremie J. Cooksey v. Cargill Meat Solutions CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API