Phil Rosemann v. Martin Sigillito
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Phil Rosemann appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment in this diversity action alleging legal malpractice against now-disbarred attorney Martin Sigillito. We agree with the district court 1 that in negligence cases like ' this one, Missouri law requires expert-witness testimony about the duty of care owed. Without providing an expert, Rosemann’s claim is invalid. Thus, we affirm the judgment. 2
I. Background
The following facts are construed in the light most favorable to Rosemann, the non-moving party. Quinn v. St. Louis County, 653 F.3d 745, 750…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Terry L. Madewell v. Mike Downs, Anthony P. Grootens, and John PrineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Klemme v. BestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Donahue v. Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, PCSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ronald Perras v. H&R BlockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Beshears v. WoodDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Cairns v. KozelDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
- Corrie Burckhard v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Corrie Burckhard v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.