Ronald Perras v. H&R Block
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, Ronald Per-ras contests the denial of his motion to certify a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. 1 Though we follow a different analysis than the district court, 2 we conclude that the court correctly denied the motion to certify. Thus, we affirm the judgment.
I. Background
In 2011, the Internal Revenue Service began regulating tax preparers who are neither attorneys nor Certified Public Accountants. Among other qualifications, the new regulations required tax preparers to pass a certification exam and obtain a preparer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Avritt v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Custom Hair Designs by Sandy v. Central Payment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Jeff Hale v. Emerson Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Lillian Vogt v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- Barker v. Nestle Purina Petcare CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Colin LaCrue and Jonathon Trahan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Vexus Fiber, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.