Legal Opinion

Pepinsky v. Monroe County Council

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1984No. 384 S 80PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIVARNIK, Justice.

This case involves an appeal from an interlocutory order entered by Special Judge Samuel R. Rosen in the Monroe Superior Court. The trial court determined that the matter raised by the plaintiffs, Harold E. Pepinsky and Roberta McClos-key, involved a public lawsuit and that the plaintiffs were unlikely to prevail on the open door law issue they raised in the complaint. The trial court required the plaintiffs to post a bond of $715,000.00 within ten days or suffer dismissal of the suit. When the deadline passed without any bond being filed, the trial court ordered the suit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Woodward Insurance, Inc. v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Common Council of Peru v. Peru Daily Tribune, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Gariup v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Captain and Co., Inc. v. TowneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Plumley v. StanelleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. PokrakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. RLG, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. ConeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sherk v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API