Legal Opinion
Haynes Stellite Co. v. Chesterfield
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1938No. 7848PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The sole legal question presented is whether a claim for damages for patent infringement, the liability for which has been fixed by court decree, but not liquidated as to amount, falls within Title 11, § 103(a) (1), U.S.C., 11 U.S.C.A. § 103(a) (1), so as to be provable in bankruptcy.
The District Court held certain claims of a patent for alloys of cobalt, chromium and tungsten invalid, and certain claims valid but not infringed, and dismissed the bill. Haynes Stellite Co. v. Chesterfield, 8 F.2d 765. The decree was reversed by this court. 6 Cir., 22 F.2d 635. The District…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Lewis v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Haynes Stellite Co. v. ChesterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atherton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- New York Credit Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Just In-Materials Designs, Ltd. (In Re Vasu Fabrics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Edl v. Kinast (In Re Edl)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1997
- In re Mackenzie Coach Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.