Legal Opinion

Haynes Stellite Co. v. Chesterfield

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1927No. 4645PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual infringement suit, based upon patent No. 1,057,423, issued April 1, 1913, to Ell-wood Haynes for a metal alloy. The pat ented article in its commercial form is called stellite, and the suit was brought by the manufacturing company, which owns the patent, against the makers of a more or less similar allay, called by the trade-name “Chesterfield.” The District Court thought that the patent sued upon was invalid as to the broader claims, and as to the narrower ones, if valid, was not infringed. Both parties find the utility of their alloys in the field of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
  5. Martin v. Ford Alexander CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API