Haynes Stellite Co. v. Chesterfield
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
This is the usual infringement suit, based upon patent No. 1,057,423, issued April 1, 1913, to Ell-wood Haynes for a metal alloy. The pat ented article in its commercial form is called stellite, and the suit was brought by the manufacturing company, which owns the patent, against the makers of a more or less similar allay, called by the trade-name “Chesterfield.” The District Court thought that the patent sued upon was invalid as to the broader claims, and as to the narrower ones, if valid, was not infringed. Both parties find the utility of their alloys in the field of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- American Stainless Steel Co. v. Ludlum Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Thompson Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUND. v. Block Drug Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
- Martin v. Ford Alexander CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.