Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Allison

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1964No. 6 Div. 66PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an application for a writ of error to the Walker Circuit Court. Allison says he was there adjudged guilty of grand larceny February 1, 1963. He makes out a partial claim of lack of counsel.

There are two reasons for denying this application: First, his allegation is that he “was not allowed the counsel of his choice, or any other authorised representative,” (italics added) and, second, he had a coram nobis hearing in the Walker Circuit Court and took no appeal.

1

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, cannot be put in effect where a defendant in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cecal Bell v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Julius Hairston v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Holloway v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Beckley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API