Legal Opinion

Julius Hairston v. State of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1972No. 71-2918PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

As this appeal from denial of habeas corpus percolates to us the substantive question is whether petitioner-appellant had counsel at the time he withdrew his former plea of not guilty and entered a guilty plea to an Alabama charge of burglary. The Federal District Court, although going to the brink of squarely holding absence of counsel, stopped short by his determination that petitioner had failed to exhaust his state remedies. We hold the Judge erred in this assessment which brings into play the question of what should now be done. In this roundabout fashion we…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prado McGee Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Robert Golden, Jr. v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Emmett v. RickettsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
  4. Bies v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Symanowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API