Legal Opinion

Kriner v. Dinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1929No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement by virtue of which the former sold to the latter a mill property, and received in payment $5,000 par value of the stock of a milling company, organized by defendant to take over the tract purchased from plaintiff, $5,-000 par value of certain stock of a coal mining company, and the balance in cash. Subsequently, plaintiff brought the present action of deceit, alleging that he took the coal mining company stock as part of the purchase price of his mill property, in reliance on certain false and fraudulent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Warren Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. FoleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Albert v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Keck v. VandykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Browning v. RodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Donaldson v. MaffucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. McKean EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Warren Balderston Co. v. Integrity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Jamestown Iron & Metal Co. v. KnofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API