Legal Opinion

Flax v. Smith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 31, 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

The parties, owners of adjoining parcels in Jamaica Plain, dispute whether the property of the defendant, Herbert Smith, trustee, 1 is burdened by an easement for water and sewer lines in favor of the property of the plaintiff, Steven Flax. After a trial without a jury, a Superior Court judge ruled that an easement by implication had been created, and he entered orders consistent with that ruling. 2 The area is depicted on the accompanying diagram, the property owned by Flax being designated on the diagram as lot A and the property owned by Smith as lots B and C.

Lots B and C, fronting on St.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Buss v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Prentiss v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Boudreau v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Town of Bedford v. CerasuoloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Zotos v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. Erickson v. Clancy Realty TrustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API