Flax v. Smith
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
The parties, owners of adjoining parcels in Jamaica Plain, dispute whether the property of the defendant, Herbert Smith, trustee, 1 is burdened by an easement for water and sewer lines in favor of the property of the plaintiff, Steven Flax. After a trial without a jury, a Superior Court judge ruled that an easement by implication had been created, and he entered orders consistent with that ruling. 2 The area is depicted on the accompanying diagram, the property owned by Flax being designated on the diagram as lot A and the property owned by Smith as lots B and C.
Lots B and C, fronting on St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leigh v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Buss v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Wellwood v. Havrah Mishna Anshi Sphard Cemetery Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Prentiss v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Boudreau v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Town of Bedford v. CerasuoloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Zotos v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Erickson v. Clancy Realty TrustMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.