Legal Opinion

Lucky Four Gold Mining Co. v. Bacon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1917No. 8674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to La Plata District Court. Hon. W. N. Searcy, Judge. On Rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This is an action commenced by the defendant in error in support of his adverse claim. The plaintiff in error had made its application for patent to the “May B.” lode. The defendant in error claimed that portion of the territory of the “May B.” lode in conflict with the “W. C. ” lode mining claim. During the hearing the defendant below by permission of the court filed its supplemental answer in which it was alleged:

“That since the institution of this action, and since the filing of the answer of the defendant herein, the patent proceedings and the application for patent referred to in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  2. Lebanon Mining Co. v. Consolidated Republican Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Benton v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Schwarz v. UlmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API