Legal Opinion

Heerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 31, 1984No. CV 78-4654 MRPPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PFAELZER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs instituted this action seeking, in their first claim, a declaratory judgment that United States patents held by defendant are void and that their operation of certain vessels in U.S. territorial waters would not infringe these patents. In their second claim, plaintiffs seek damages for unfair competition, based on an allegedly groundless infringement suit that defendant brought against them in Scotland, and on defendant’s alleged threats to bring further suits of this type against plaintiffs and their customers.

Defendant has moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  2. Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  3. K-Lath, Division of Tree Island Wire (USA), Inc. v. Davis Wire Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. Electro Medical Systems S.A. v. Cooper Lasersonics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Team Angry Filmworks, Inc. v. GeerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API