Broyderick v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge
The plaintiffs in all three cases are retired officers of the United States Naval Reserve. They were retired pursuant to section 6 of the Act of February 21, 1946, 60 Stat. 26, 27, each of them having had more than 20 years of active service. Their retired pay was computed on the formula prescribed in section 7 of the same statute. The formula was the number of years service which the officer was entitled to count in the computation of his active duty pay multiplied by 2% percent of the active duty pay of the officer’s retired rank.
Section 431 of the Officer Personnel Act of 1947, 61 Stat.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tanner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- United States v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Guilmette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914
- Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1915
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jalbert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Kennedy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Brewington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Dingley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Jalbert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.