Legal Opinion

Barber v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 19, 1915No. 32961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The question in this case is, Was the claimant “ appointed to the Navy from civil life”? He entered the Naval Academy as a midshipman in 1908. During his course at the Naval Academy an examination by the permanent medical board disclosed that he had a defect of hearing, which was regarded as sufficient to disqualify him from continuing in the naval service.

Read the full summary

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The question in this case is, Was the claimant “ appointed to the Navy from civil life”? He entered the Naval Academy as a midshipman in 1908. During his course at the Naval Academy an examination by the permanent medical board disclosed that he had a defect of hearing, which was regarded as sufficient to disqualify him from continuing in the naval service. He was requested to tender his resignation, with an intimation that he would be dropped if he failed to do so. On application, however, he was allowed to continue his course at the academy and to…

1Opinion of the CourtBarNey, Judge

The question for decision in this case is the proper construction to be given to the following legislation contained in the act of March 3,1899:

“All officers, including warrant officers, who have been or may be appointed to the Navy from civil life shall, on the date of appointment, be credited, for computing their pay, with five years’ service.”

The plaintiff entered the Naval Academy August 3, 1908, and remained there until nearly the graduating time of his class in 1912. On April 5 in the latter year he was officially informed that on account of deafness disclosed upon examination before a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. AlgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Guilmette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Broyderick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  2. Cronin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926
  3. Guilmette v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  4. Eligibility of Retired Military Officer for Appointment as NASA Administrator, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2009
  5. Eligibility of a Retired Military Officer for Appointment as Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API