Legal Opinion

Barretta v. Barretta

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGolden, J.

Action by wife for a separation. The parties were married September 4, 1938. They have a daughter born July 23, 1940. Since the birth of their child, plaintiff has refused any sexual relations with her husband unless he would use a contraceptive. She so testified on cross-examination and stated that as a result of these difficulties over marital relations, they separated, she and their child going to live with her parents, she taking the furniture and household belongings, and he living with his sister.

A wife who demands benefits under the marriage contract must prove that she is willing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. People v. . SangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Foy Productions, Ltd. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. People v. ByrneNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Universal Film Manufacturing Co. v. BellNew York Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zagarow v. ZagarowNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bradley v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Bradley v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API